<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>michael.cervieri.com &#187; social media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael.cervieri.com/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael.cervieri.com</link>
	<description>Media Musings and General Foibles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 02:30:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Year According to Twitter</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/02/the-year-according-to-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/02/the-year-according-to-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arab spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year in review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/13633538952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday it was Facebook with its most shared links of 2011. Today it’s Twitter with its “most important”.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center">
<object name="kaltura_player_1322801339" id="kaltura_player_1322801339" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" allowfullscreen="true" height="208" width="400" data="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/0_rlf8pctv/uiconf_id/5590821"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowNetworking" value="all" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><param name="movie" value="http://cdnapi.kaltura.com/index.php/kwidget/wid/0_rlf8pctv/uiconf_id/5590821" /><param name="flashVars" value="autoPlay=false&#038;screensLayer.startScreenOverId=startScreen&#038;screensLayer.startScreenId=startScreen" /></object>
</div>
<p>Yesterday <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/13592440072/who-we-share-on-facebook" >it was Facebook</a> with its most shared links of 2011.</p>
<p>Today it’s Twitter with its “<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/year-twitter-2011s-top-tweets/story?id=15065335#.TthYnhy1_A2" >most important</a>”.</p>
<p>Among the mix is “Welcome back Egypt #Jan25” for the Arab Spring and “Helicopter hovering above Abbottabad at 1AM (is a rare event)” which foretold the raid on Osama Bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan. </p>
<p>So too is “my daughter her name is sarah m. rivera,” sent out by a homeless man in New York who hadn’t seen his daughter in 11 years. They were reunited the next day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/02/the-year-according-to-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who We Share on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/01/who-we-share-on-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/01/who-we-share-on-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/13592440072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Tuesday Facebook released a 2011 top 40 list of the its most shared articles in the United States.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><img src="http://27.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lvj9i0ntYK1qedj2ho1_500.jpg"/></div>
<p>On Tuesday Facebook released a 2011 <a href="https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-media/most-shared-articles-on-facebook-in-2011/283221585046671" >top 40 list</a> of the its most shared articles in the United States.</p>
<p>Coming in at number 1: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/13/world/asia/satellite-photos-japan-before-and-after-tsunami.html" >Satellite Photos of Japan, Before and After the Quake and Tsunami</a> from the New York Times.</p>
<p>Rounding out the list at number 40: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/08/24/technology/steve-jobs-patents.html" >Steve Jobs’s Patents, also from the New York Times</a>.</p>
<p>In between are articles and videos such as <a href="http://shine.yahoo.com/event/momentsofmotherhood/laughing-baby-loves-ripping-paper-2459529" >Laughing Baby Loves Ripping Paper!</a> (at number 30 from Yahoo) and <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/OPINION/04/19/granderson.children.dress/index.html" >Parents, don’t dress your girls like tramps</a> (at number 4 from CNN).</p>
<p>While the sample size is small, we thought looking at percentage shares by company would be interesting.  It’s not much of a surprise that familiar names dominate the list but we’ll dig around and see if we can get a larger sample and see what that might hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/12/01/who-we-share-on-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Long Like the King!</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/11/30/long-like-the-king/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/11/30/long-like-the-king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 22:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lese majesty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thailand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/13560725455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Thailand, liking and sharing Facebook links that are considered insults to the royal family could put you in jail.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Thailand, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lese-majesty" >lese majesty</a> laws make make it illegal to criticize the monarchy. To make sure it stays that way, enforcers of the country’s Computer Crimes Act are watching not only what people are saying online, but what they are liking and sharing as well.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/25/thailand_monarchy_insults_facebook/" >the Register</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The country’s Information and Communications Technology minister, Anudith Nakornthap, said that if such users “share” or “like” articles on Facebook that are considered to insult the Thai royal family, they could face sentences of <strong>between three and 15 years in jail</strong> – as laid out in Thailand’s Computer Crimes Act.</p>
<p>According to AFP, the dominant social network was asked to remove <strong>over 10,000 pages</strong> of material that contained images or text that the Thai ministry said was “offensive” to the monarchy.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It’s not just social networks that fall under watchful eyes. A 61-year-old man was recently convicted of sending four text messages that officials believed were offensive to the royal family.</p>
<p>His sentence: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/24/world/asia/20-year-term-for-text-messages-against-thai-king-bhumibol.html" >20 years in jail</a>… or, five years per offending message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/11/30/long-like-the-king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Censors Target Social Media</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/10/27/chinese-censors-target-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/10/27/chinese-censors-target-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great firewall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sina Weibo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/11993146932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Great Firewall isn't great enough. China wants more control.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“China is faced with an Internet-management crisis,” Liu Yunshan, the country’s propaganda chief, <a  href="http://www.chinapost.com.tw/commentary/the-china-post/special-to-the-china-post/2011/09/26/317869/p2/Netizens-take.htm">said back in September</a></p>
<p>Liu is talking about the country’s inability to control and censor communication across social networks. Of particular concern is Sina Weibo, the Chinese version of Twitter, which currently has about 400 million users.</p>
<p>The country is famous for its <a  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Firewall_of_China">Great Firewall</a> and thirty-plus thousand censors that investigate Web sites and join message boards to either delete comments or spin government messages their own way. But trying to do the same to the Chinese equivalent of Twitter posts has escaped the censors.</p>
<p>As the <a  href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/china-gets-tough-on-social-media-20111027-1mm51.html">Sydney Morning Herald notes</a>, “As quickly as [censors] delete individual messages, they find they have already been spread by hundreds, or thousands, of others.”</p>
<p>Proposed solution: Throw more censors at the “problem”. Sina just hired a thousand people to monitor messages across its network.</p>
<p>Via the <a  href="http://www.smh.com.au/world/china-gets-tough-on-social-media-20111027-1mm51.html">Sydney Morning Herald</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>China’s Communist Party has set out to curtail social networking following years of unfettered growth after its top committee issued an edict launching a new drive to control open messaging.</p>
<p>Websites such as Sina Weibo, a Chinese version of Twitter, have been allowed to grow explosively, with 400 million Chinese posting opinions and sharing information.</p>
<p>The Central Committee of the Communist Party, a 300-strong body of party, state and army leaders, has signalled its alarm that there is no equivalent to the Great Firewall that marshals the internet. It has promised to “strengthen the guidance and administration of social internet services and instant communications tools” to ensure “orderly dissemination of information”.</p>
<p>Anyone spreading “false rumours” was threatened with stern punishment.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to the Vancouver Sun, <a  href="http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Beijing+seeks+control+social+media/5614444/story.html">punishment includes arrest</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Already a number of people have been put under what China calls “administrative detention,” usually 15 days under arrest. One was accused of writing a fake report about changes to the income tax system. A student was jailed for claiming that cancer had killed eight village officials in Yunnan. A third was detained for writing that a Chinese jet had crashed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Originally posted at the <a href="http:futurejournalismproject.org" alt="Future Journalism Project" title="Future Journalism Project">Future Journalism Project</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/10/27/chinese-censors-target-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media? There’s a Magazine for That</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/17/social-media-there%e2%80%99s-a-magazine-for-that/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/17/social-media-there%e2%80%99s-a-magazine-for-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/9048145463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new print magazine markets itself as a source of social media prowess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lq38xmBlQz1qedj2ho1_500.jpg"/></div>
<p>No, seriously, there is. Not that that’s a bad thing but perhaps we’d feel a little more secure in its quality and viability if the <a  href="http://thesocialmediamonthly.com/">Web site itself</a> was a little more — how shall we say — inspired.</p>
<p>Via <a  href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/social_media_theres_a_monthly_print_magazine_for_t.php">ReadWriteWeb</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The first issue of [Social Media Monthly] is out today. Publisher Cool Blue Company announced its availability at the Barnes and Noble bookstore chain in the U.S., as well as distribution in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark…</p>
<p>…The publication is also available as a “standalone flash digital e-zine” and an iTunes app.</p>
<p>The debut issue’s cover was designed by Yiying Lu, known for his design of Twitter’s fail whale.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Originally posted on <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org">the Future Journalism Project.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/17/social-media-there%e2%80%99s-a-magazine-for-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>England Ponders Social Media Ban</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/11/england-ponders-social-media-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/11/england-ponders-social-media-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 18:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[england]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/8785702679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As London riots England considers following what Egypt, Libya and Syria do.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Via Matthew Ingram, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2011/08/11/blaming-the-tools-britain-proposes-a-social-media-ban/">GigaOm</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>It seems totalitarian states like Egypt and Libya aren’t the only ones struggling with the impact of social media and the desire to muzzle services like Twitter and Facebook. In the wake of the riots in London, the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/11/david-cameron-rioters-social-media">British government says it’s considering shutting down access to social networks</a> — as well as Research In Motion’s BlackBerry messenger service — and is asking the companies involved to help. <a href="http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pm-statement-on-disorder-in-england/">Prime Minister David Cameron said</a> not only is his government considering banning individuals from social media if they are suspected of causing disorder, but it has asked Twitter and other providers to take down posts that are contributing to “unrest.”</p>
<p>The British PM also said he has asked the police whether they need any new powers to stop the violence, including the ability to shut down social networks or communications services if they believe these tools are being used to incite unrest.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Originally posted on <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org">the Future Journalism Project.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/11/england-ponders-social-media-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scoop.it Sounds Like an Updated Tumblr</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/08/sounds-of-tumblr/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/08/sounds-of-tumblr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scoop it]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/8649402049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Tumblr had a built in feed reader that users could set up within their dashboards they might have Scoop It.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><object width="500" height="320"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bnr6QKKcsII&#038;rel=0&#038;egm=0&#038;showinfo=0&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bnr6QKKcsII&#038;rel=0&#038;egm=0&#038;showinfo=0&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="320" allowFullScreen="true" wmode="transparent"></embed></object></div>
<p>Sounds kind of Tumblry if Tumblr had a built in feed reader that users could set up within their dashboards. </p>
<p><a href="http://ramaamultimedia.tumblr.com/post/8615665784">ramaamultimedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong><span>A bit about web curation site “Scoop It.”</span></strong></p>
<p><span><span>This site feels a lot like a more interesting and visual “Delicious,” <em>the social bookmarking site.</em></span></span></p>
<p><span><span>Scoop.it allows you to file and arrange content in a design conscious fashion &#8211; a magazine format, <em>if you will. </em>Which of course is shareable. </span></span></p>
<p><span><span>You can edit how and where on the page your curated items appear, change the headline, summary and the size of the pictures on the posts as well if you wanted &#8211; as though you’re a magazine editor. </span><br/><span> </span><br/><span>The feature that is potentially of greater interest is the ability to add key words and allow it to scour social platforms for content related to your curation.  (Yes similar to Google reader/alerts in a way) </span><br/><span> </span><br/><span>In theory this should mean you wouldn’t miss a thing. However, in reality the terms don’t always bring up great quality content, particularly if you follow a huge subject like “Social Media” or  “Journalism!” I often end up posting articles which have been recommended to me on Twitter, G+ or  email on Scoop.it via a very handy bookmarklet. By downloading it from the site onto your browser with one clip and interesting article you’ve found will end up on your “magazine.”</span></span></p>
<p><span><br/><span>Very user friendly interface too. I just hope they improve the search functionality because that really would make it special. </span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Originally posted on <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org">the Future Journalism Project.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/08/sounds-of-tumblr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Propaganda</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/06/social-media-propaganda/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/06/social-media-propaganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/8559747260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Media Propaganda Posters
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpik38s5Tq1qedj2ho1_500.jpg"/><br/> <br/><img src="http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpik38s5Tq1qedj2ho2_500.jpg"/><br/> <br/><img src="http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpik38s5Tq1qedj2ho3_500.jpg"/><br/> <br/></div>
<p><strong>Social Media Propaganda Posters</strong></p>
<p>Via <a  href="https://plus.google.com/114468593663912084118/posts/87gmqbLRVx9">Aaron Wood</a>. Click through for more.</p>
<p><em>Originally posted on the <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org" target="_blank">Future Journalism Project</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/06/social-media-propaganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Newt, Size and Politics</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/04/newt-size-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/04/newt-size-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaigning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newt gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/8477597269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newt has an impressively sized Twitter following. But Mashable reports that less than 10% is actually human.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="center"><img src="http://26.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lpeondRCrI1qedj2ho1_500.jpg"/></div>
<p><strong>In politics, size matters</strong>.</p>
<p>How large is the mailing list, how much money was raised and, increasingly, how many friends, followers and other social networking whatnot all becomes valuable lucre in the media’s horse race coverage of the next election.</p>
<p>Enter Newt Gingrich.</p>
<p>A social media mastermind <a  href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58812.html">proclaims an astonished press</a> as it looks at his 1.3 million plus Twitter followers. </p>
<p>Yet, like most things, what we see is not necessarily true. Mashable reports that over 90% of Gingrich’s Twitter followers <a  href="http://mashable.com/2011/08/02/newt-gingrich-twitter-followers/">aren’t even human</a>. It appears that he’s been paying to build up his overall number count but instead of people he’s getting robots, zombies and the undead following him.</p>
<p><strong>Image</strong>: <a  href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/bobcanada/3888108984/">Robot Runamuck</a> by Bob Canada via Flickr.</p>
<p><em>Originally posted on <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org">the Future Journalism Project.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/08/04/newt-size-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Psyops and Social Media</title>
		<link>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/03/18/psyops-and-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/03/18/psyops-and-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cervieri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrapbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fjp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future journalism project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psyops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://futurejournalismproject.org/post/3943709013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California firm wins military contract to create fake online personas that influence online conversation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That the online universe is the next frontier in modern warfare <a title="Cyber Attack - James Fallows, The Atlantic"  href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/03/cyber-warriors/7917/">isn’t necessarily news</a>.</p>
<p>Distributed Denial of Service Attacks, <a title="Stuxnet worm Iran"  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet">Stuxnet</a>-style worms and infiltration into national defense and resource information systems are realities <a  href="http://threatpost.com/en_us/blogs/nsa-director-says-us-has-duty-secure-internet-090710">we frequently read about</a>.</p>
<p>And it’s not necessarily news that the United States has campaigned on social networks via the State Department <a title="State Department Social Media Strategy - Mashable"  href="http://mashable.com/2010/05/17/state-department-social-media/">to win hearts and minds</a> around the globe.</p>
<p>What is news is that a California firm called Ntrepid just won a $2.76 million contract from the US Defense Department <strong>to create fake online personas</strong> in order to influence online conversation.</p>
<p>Via <a title="Ntrepid Wins Defense Department Contract for Psyops Warfare in Social Media Space"  href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks">the Guardian</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda.</p>
<p>A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an “online persona management service” that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to the <a  href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/mar/17/us-spy-operation-social-networks">Telegraph</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The personas should be “replete with background , history, supporting details, and cyber presences that are technically, culturally and geographically consistent”, a<a  href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:x77_OqXU-bwJ:https://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&#038;mode=form&#038;id=fb52e538177e19516382984146bfc004&#038;tab=core&#038;_cview=0+RTB220610&#038;cd=4&#038;hl=en&#038;ct=clnk&#038;gl=uk&#038;client=safari&#038;source=www.google.co.uk"> US Central Command (Centcom) tender document</a> said.</p>
<p>“Personas must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So careful with who you get chatty with online. You may be talking to a <a  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_(Internet)">sock puppet</a>.</p>
<p><em>Originally posted on the <a href="http://futurejournalismproject.org" target="_blank">Future Journalism Project</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.cervieri.com/2011/03/18/psyops-and-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

