Some say an interview with ScribeMedia.org is the kiss of death.

In the past week Jeff Hayzlett, Chief Marketing Officer for Kodak, appeared with us and then announced he’s leaving the company. Then, we interview paidContent founder Rafat Ali days before he announces his departure from paidContent.org and ContentNext Media.

Sponsored by

Watch all interviews from Streaming Media East.

Register now for

Trust us, it’s a coincidence. Really, it is.

It’s just that a lot can happen in a week.

Rafat though comes through in a wide ranging interview that touches on a number of moving parts in the media ecosystem. This includes the Wall Street Journal’s existing subscription model and attempts by the paper to increase its reader base to a more general audience; the New York Times and its move toward their planned subscription model early next year; and a few pokes at news aggregators like the Huffington Post and Newser.

What we find interesting though are his thoughts on the iPad experience that come about halfway through the interview.

It’s not the savior of the magazine industry as some might hope, Rafat argues. “I think they will be disappointed at the end of the day.”

“I think it’s a little silly that adding interactive elements will make [a magazine] readable. If you don’t read it online, and don’t read it in print, you won’t read it on the iPad either.”

Instead, the device is better used for media consumption through applications like that created by Netflix.

At the end of the day, this may leave room for Amazon’s Kindle which Rafat calls “a more peaceful experience.”

Not that he expects the physical device to be the dedicated delivery system in the next few years. Instead, he expects the Kindle software to be everywhere, be it in a dedicated e-reader, mobile device or tablet.

Amazon is, after all, in the business of selling books, not in producing electronics.

Anyway, we wish Rafat well in his future endeavors and send him off with a kiss… of life.

About The Business of News and Devices with Rafat Ali

This article originally appeared on ScribeMedia.org.

Please visit the original to rant, rave or otherwise discuss.

A long-time advertising adage runs something like this: buy time on television and fifty percent of your budget is wasted. Which fifty? Who knows. But fifty percent it will be.

Sponsor

IAB coverage was made possible through the kind support of CPX Interactive.

The target is simply too broad. Selling men’s deodorant? Your ad spend just hit a considerable amount of women and adolescents. Selling womanly products? A bunch of men just switched channels.

This much is known. Television may be our greatest mass medium but it fails the advertiser specifically because it’s such a mass medium. Yes there are numbers in that buy. But do those numbers contain the specific demographic we hope to reach? Cross our fingers that perhaps so.

But next time you’re in a meeting room see how well the fingers crossed strategy goes down. When the dust settles and the abuse subsides, give us a call and we’ll start thinking strategy, round two.

Television people know this. No matter how segmented our thousand digital channels may be, they’re never quite segmented enough for the ad buyer. There are simply too many unknown people channel surfing on the other side of the tube.

Avner Ronen knows this too. The founder and CEO of Boxee, creators of the open source, “Internet TV” media center, might seem an unlikely savior for the small screen industry and what ails it but savior they might be.

“One of the worst things that happened to advertising on TV is DVR,” he says in the video above, referring to the increasing American propensity to time shift television viewing by recording shows.

As Nielsen reported last year:

“Must See TV” doesn’t mean that people are gathering around their TV anymore during primetime on a Thursday night. Appointment viewing is now when the viewer wants to watch it thanks to DVRs. As of March 2009, 30.6 percent of households in Nielsen’s National People Meter Panel have a DVR, up significantly from just 12.3 percent in January 2007.
A key factor to this expansion is the integration of DVRs into cable and DBS set top boxes: 55 percent of DVR homes had it as part of their cable box and 40 percent had a DVR within their DBS box. Just 5 percent had a standalone DVR. And as households recognize the convenience DVR offers, a growing number are becoming multi-DVR households. 25 percent of homes had two, while 5 percent had three or more.

Take a step back and you realize that not only will an advertiser pay for an audience that might not care for its wares, but those that record programs might skip over the commercials entirely.

Again, we know this but Ronen thinks Internet TV could change it. DVR, he believes, could become obsolete once programming enters the cloud. The point here is why would people record if the programming is always there. Then, if and when delivered through a Boxee type application through the Internet, advertisers can get the measurement details they crave.

“You get the benefits of targeting and measurement and accountability that you have on the Internet and that should be great news for the industry,” Ronen believes.

Content consumer stand to benefit too. If traditional television is a one to many broadcast medium with recipients passive consumers of advertisements, Internet TV turns us into active participants in that process.

Hulu’s been experimenting with this model, asking viewers to decide what type of advertising they’d like to see before watching clips and shows. This will increasingly become the norm and with active audience participation and ownership, the idea is there will be greater recall rates and engagement with actual brand advertising.

Boxee’s currently innovating. They plan on releasing a payment platform in the second quarter of this year. Good news for the networks and other publishers that are looking for monetization strategies.

“When people value content they will pay for it,” says Ronen.

For Boxee skeptics, Internet engagement, measurement and discernible metrics are certainly a better strategy than fingers crossed on a lost fifty percent.

About Aardvark and the Synaptic Web

This article originally appeared on ScribeMedia.org.

Please visit the original to rant, rave or otherwise discuss.

Possibly Related Posts

• Boxee as The (anti-TiVO) Solution
• You Want a Cigarette After That?
• Jordan Hoffner of Youtube and the challenges of Online Video Advertising
]]> http://michael.cervieri.com/2010/02/26/the-other-fifty-percent-%e2%80%93-an-advertiser%e2%80%99s-dilemma/feed/ 0